Share this post

Tabitha Speaks Politics
Tabitha Speaks Politics
Returning the Lifeline: How Kerr County's Resistance to Federal Funds Heightened Flood Risks

Returning the Lifeline: How Kerr County's Resistance to Federal Funds Heightened Flood Risks

When Pride Overrode Pragmatism: The Consequences of Rejecting Federal Aid in a Flood-Prone Community

Tabitha Speaks Politics's avatar
Tabitha Speaks Politics
Jul 12, 2025
∙ Paid
25

Share this post

Tabitha Speaks Politics
Tabitha Speaks Politics
Returning the Lifeline: How Kerr County's Resistance to Federal Funds Heightened Flood Risks
4
Share

Audio Clip: Kerr County Townhall

Nestled in the heart of Texas, Kerr County is no stranger to nature's fury. In June 2015, the skies unleashed a torrent of rain, leading to catastrophic floods that claimed twenty lives and left a path of destruction. In response and without hesitation, President Obama declared a federal disaster, releasing over $100 million in FEMA funds to aid Texas in recovery and future storm preparedness.

A County in Need

Kerr County, located in the notorious "Flash Flood Alley," recognized the urgent need to protect its residents. The county requested $1 million to upgrade water gauges, install sensors, and develop a public alert website for flood warnings. Securing these funds, however, proved to be a daunting task.

The First Hurdles

Between 2016 and 2018, Kerr County made two attempts to secure the necessary funding, but both were denied by the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM). The first request in 2016 was rejected due to an outdated hazard mitigation plan that did not meet federal standards. The second attempt in 2017-2018 saw the state prioritizing coastal regions affected by Hurricane Harvey, leaving Kerr County without the support it desperately needed.

Local Challenges and Community Decisions

Kerrville, the county's largest city, opted not to participate in a grant application requiring a $50,000 local contribution due to budget constraints and differing priorities. Many residents and officials also opposed installing flood sirens, citing concerns about cost and noise. Instead, they favored a web-based alert system, believing it would be sufficient to ensure public safety.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Tabitha Speaks Politics to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tabitha Speaks Politics
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share